Whitman's truth problem
The San Jose Mercury News has made it known who they support for governor of California, and it ain’t Meg Whitman:
[Whitman] has demonstrated through her campaign a loose relationship with the truth, a poor understanding of government and a penchant for platitudes. Her carefully packaged positions offer pat solutions for problems whose depth and complexity clearly elude her. We recommended her in the Republican primary over the shape-shifting Steve Poizner, but as the campaign has unfolded we’ve come to see that she utterly lacks the qualifications to be governor.
Whitman is spending more than $140 million on this campaign — breaking all records — largely to buy misleading ads and pay a herd of consultants to tell her what to say. Their aim is obvious, targeting various interests. What we don’t know is who Meg Whitman really is, how she thinks or what she values.
Whitman is no Sarah Palin - she has a brain and actually did something with her life. But she decided it was better to offer “platitudes” and manufactured outrage than real solutions. Better to play fast and loose with the truth than say what you’re really about. I suppose we’ll find out who the real Meg Whitman is if she gains office, but I have a funny feeling Californians will be worse off for it.
Frankly, if you can’t run on your own beliefs, you are a charlatan and a con artist. Or a Tea Party candidate Republican.